The presidential debate between Trump and Harris on ABC News on September 10 was originally nothing new, but the revelations of an internal whistleblower gave this originally unremarkable war of words new highlights.
The information released by the whistleblower shows copies of the affidavits that ABC and Harris’ team colluded to cheat before the debate. Harris has made small adjustments to various rules including debate issues, time, and questioning methods.
Copy of Affidavit
At the same time, some attentive netizens discovered that Harris seemed to have been wearing a pair of wireless headphones disguised as pearl earrings during the debate.
A few days ago, Trump complained on social media that he was “one against three” in the presidential debate and argued for who won the presidential debate. Unexpectedly, support came in all at once.
The ruthless revelations about ABC ‘s biased operation have once again exposed the dilapidated so-called “neutrality” and “objectivity” of the American media to the public’s gaze.
Why did ABC News so brazenly engage in “private exchanges” with Democratic candidates? Can such media be “fair” at all?
Who is ABC ?
As long as you delve a little into ABC ‘s origins, you will find that it seems inevitable that they will help Harris secretly .
This news division of one of the three major commercial broadcasters in the United States was acquired by Disney for 1.6 million in 1995 and became a news media under the Disney Company .
As we all know, Disney ’s largest shareholder Vanguard and second largest shareholder BlackRock are both Jewish companies.
At the same time, ESPN , the cable television arm of ABC Group , has chairman and CEO Steven Bornstein , who is also Jewish.
From this, we can see that it is reasonable for Jewish funders to help the elite camp of the Democratic Party.
Taking another look at ABC ‘s broadcasting history, it is also full of misdeeds.
In 2013 , ABC broadcast a TV program with obviously insulting remarks about China, which triggered a collective protest march by tens of thousands of Chinese in front of the company in Manhattan.
Overseas Chinese in the United States protest against TV stations’ insulting remarks about China
In 2019 , ABC caused another scandal for hiding the “Epstein Case Sex Slave Interview” video . At that time, ABC was still blaming the British government, but after careful calculation, netizens quickly discovered that they were doing this to protect the Democratic candidate Hillary who was participating in the general election.
Of course, ABC News is not happy with Trump either. In 2017 , ABC News published an “internal message” that the president colluded with the Russians. However, it didn’t take long for the Democrats to be happy when they themselves came out to clarify that the news was wrong, which made a lot of fun.
Therefore, when discussing the presidential debate at the beginning, Trump seemed reluctant to Harris’ proposal to hold the debate on ABC News .
They are all thousand-year-old foxes
The reason why Trump is so indignant at ABC ‘s host this time and wants to accuse Harris of even the details of standing on a higher stage is because, of course, he himself is guilty of this.
Trump, who has appeared in major reality shows and TV series, is well aware of the visual effects of media communication, and his reputation as the creator of “Twitter politics” is not in vain.
Back then, Trump took advantage of the fragmented nature of social media, relying on his golden sentences and short videos on Twitter to distract the focus of issues, and entered the White House amidst a wave of bad-mouthing.
Trump on the front page of the magazine
They are all thousand-year-old foxes, why are they still playing in a fairy tale?
However, in the United States, the simpler, cruder and more indiscriminate the methods are, the more effective they are among voters .
As a result, mainstream media such as CNN and CBS controlled by the Democratic Party have continued to attack Trump , with labels such as “racist” and “criminal” one after another.
Trump is committed to launching a media information war , spending hundreds of millions of dollars on advertising, and using major social media accounts to launch personal attacks on Harris and Biden.
A few days ago, Musk issued a call for his $ 47 vote on Twitter in an effort to attract attention , but mainstream media such as CNN just refused to report it!
It’s a pleasure to go back and forth on both sides.
During the sensational “dog-eating-cat” incident in September this year , the mainstream media invited officials and celebrities to clarify and satirize Trump’s xenophobia and racial prejudice, while social media widely circulated a photo of a black man carrying two Photo of a goose.
All kinds of news are true and false, and it is difficult to predict whether they are true or not.
But what is the truth? No one cares. As the American writer Lance Bennett pointed out in his book, for the general public, politics is nothing more than a series of plastic images and sounds on television and radio.
The so-called truth is nothing more than a tool used by American politicians to manipulate public opinion and group emotions.
left vs right
Nowadays, is there any media in the United States that people can trust?
In a recent poll released by the Gallup consulting firm, less than one-third of Americans trust the U.S. news media, setting another record low.
However, it is no longer news that the media in the “lighthouse country” has divided positions.
Many years ago, Tim, a scholar at the University of California, used the political leaning coefficient to quantitatively measure various media in the United States. The left-leaning degree of mainstream media can be clearly displayed using data.
The darker the media, the more left-leaning it is
Almost all of the mainstream media is left-leaning and “liberal.”
Why? The answer is: money!
Since the Telecommunications Act introduced by Clinton in 1996 started a wave of media privatization and large-scale mergers and acquisitions, the foundation of American public media has begun to quietly fester.
To this day, almost all mainstream media shareholders are groups controlled by Jewish capital.
In addition to the Disney- owned ABC mentioned above , the other two largest commercial broadcasters in the United States – Time Warner and CBS , as well as the three major newspapers “New York Times”, “Wall Street Journal ” and “Washington Post”, without exception All controlled by Jewish tycoons.
The Jews, who formed the “Liberal Alliance” with the Democratic Party nearly a hundred years ago , have firmly blocked all kinds of political insider information and information through their political marriage with the White House for decades.
A survey shows that about 90% of mainstream media ’s negative reports on Trump are negative . At the same time, these media have obvious liberal tendencies in discussions of gun legalization, homosexuality, and racism .
However, when it comes to “freedom” news that people really care about, such as the derailment of the “drug train” and the Chicago shooting, the mainstream media have collectively shut down.
To what extent can such media be called “mainstream”?
The media industry, which is deeply ill, has become even worse after Trump entered social media.
The propaganda matrix created by Trump on multiple platforms such as Twitter , Instagram , and Periscope has made the voices of this camp pervasive on social media.
As a result, social media filled with market sentiment are full of extreme remarks about destroying the federal government, immigrants eating dogs and cats, and imposing 1,000% tariffs. The more absurd the statements are, the more they stand out in the media where traffic is king.
Coupled with the unique echo chamber and short-lived effect of social media, false statements become more popular in the media.
On one side, there is a “Taiping Tianxia” that is divorced from reality and serves the elites. On the other side, there is gossip in the market that is difficult to distinguish between true and false. How should the public choose?
The nonsensical war of words between the two sides during the presidential debate is nothing more than a microcosm of the extreme divisions in American society and public opinion.
More than two hundred years ago, Jefferson, the drafter of the United States’ Declaration of Independence , proposed that public viewing and hearing should be regarded as the “fourth right” independent of the executive, legislative and judicial authorities.
Unfortunately, in today’s United States of America, such a “fourth estate” seems to have entered the grave along with its originator.